Navigating Loss While Being a Young Academic

Stephanie Hare

I am writing this post in the hopes that it will reach someone who is currently grieving a loss while managing as a young academic (e.g., PhD student or postdoc). I am not a professional grief counsellor (as will become evident), so take any advice I give with a grain of salt and scrutinise it against your own judgment and/or against that of a real therapist, if you’re lucky enough to have access to professional help right now. 

As a 28-year-old, I have all of the nuclear family members, as well as aunts and uncles, that were on this earth when I was born. In fact, at the time I’m writing this, I even have all of my grandparents—at an impressive 92, 90, 88, and 87 years old. Unfortunately, my Oma (who is the eldest of the group) was taken to the hospital last night with a very low heart rate. She is one of the people I admire most in this world, and even if she does make it through this particular event, I will inevitably have to confront losing her soon. I’m writing this post to attempt to organize my thoughts on experiencing traumatic loss alongside finding your footing in academia (or at least, share my personal experiences in this regard).  

The first time I experienced a traumatic loss was in 2015, as a second-year PhD student. I was extraordinarily lucky to have made it that long (though it probably does no good to think that way). My first year of grad school was basically an extension of undergrad + teaching responsibilities + trying to figure out what research to do. There was a lot of chaos, but the constant was the cohort of students that all joined the department at the same time. We were a relatively tight-knit group, and considered ourselves to be more-or-less family from the start (sibling rivalries and all). From this cohort, me and one other student (we’ll call him V) joined the research lab from which I ultimately got my PhD. We weren’t super close, but I attributed that to the fact that we were at different stages of life: He was married with a newborn, and I… what was I? A prototypical 23-year old?  

And being a prototypical 23-year old, I was figuring a lot of stuff out. As I was preparing for my qualifying exam in my second year, I was expected to do an arrow-pushing mechanism (a la your favorite intro organic chemistry class) on the whiteboard and I just absolutely could not figure out where to start. Everyone was waiting for me, some people (including my advisor) were getting very impatient, telling me to just start. So what did I start doing? Crying, silent tears, facing the whiteboard, feeling embarrassment starting to compound the anxiety. It felt like a nightmare, which thankfully eventually ended. When I went home that evening I found a message in my inbox from V. I’m actually going to quote the whole email thread because it’s so grad school:

V: Hey Stephanie, sorry about earlier I didn't realize you were getting upset or I would have tried to be more helpful. You should try not to be so hard on yourself though, you're pchem and a new grad student so no one expects you to get everything right, and the mitsunobu is a hard one to get if you haven't seen it before, there are a lot of steps. […] If mechanisms were easy they wouldn't be any fun, the point is to learn something from them and build your reasoning skills by thinking about them. 

Hope any of that is helpful. 

Me: Thanks V. I really don't feel justified getting so upset, which makes it even more stupid and embarrassing. I guess I just feel pressured to be much better at mechanisms because I made the choice to join this group, and I don't always want to be the slow one that holds everyone back. I just need to work harder at them and try to get over the feeling that everyone thinks I'm a big idiot. Thank you again, I promise not to be such a Debbie downer tomorrow. 

V: Hey someone has to be a big idiot with me. And next year we'll have idiots to replace us as we get better lol.

Me: Haha obviously you are not a big idiot. But here's to hoping our replacements make us look like geniuses. :)

V was really supportive and had a really good heart when he saw other people struggling. However, he was having some personal and mental health issues that I only ever got a glimpse of. He stopped showing up to lab, he didn’t participate in our cohort’s group activities, nor our research group’s social events. It sucks to think about because, looking back now these were such obvious red flags, but at the time there was… I don’t really want to say it, but almost a resentment that he wasn’t participating. We (his peers) seemed to all see it as a choice to not take the ~grad school experience~ seriously enough. 

And then one day, my boss emailed the research group to say that V had taken his own life. We all said the same thing: We knew there was a problem, but we had no idea it was bad enough to end up here: To leave behind a wife and a baby, to not make good on his implicit promise to be a part of our research group throughout our academic journeys. So the group leaned on each other. We went to dinner together. We wrote letters to V’s baby together. We went to the funeral together. There were so many tears, and it felt novel yet natural to mourn together with my research group. We had endured so much professional stress together, we felt a structure to managing our grief as a unit. 

A couple of months later, while we certainly hadn’t “completed” the grieving process (because, spoiler: there’s no such thing), we were, as a group, making professional progress again. One morning, I got up to go to work and I swear, as soon as I got up, I felt my heart pounding way too hard, way too fast. I’m not a spiritual person by any means, but I swear, when there’s something wrong in your family, you can feel it before you actually get any news. Just as I was about to head out the door, I got a call from my mom. She said a childhood friend, neighbor who grew up with me, like a brother, had drowned. She told me the story of him swimming in a river and ending up in a place where he couldn’t get out. I remember thinking it just wasn’t true—they’ll get the rescue crew out there and he’ll be fine. My mom reiterated that no, that’s not really the stage we’re at. There is no possibility that he survived. So I said, “… okay. Thanks for letting me know.” And hung up. I walked outside, got on my bike, started biking to the lab when about ten minutes into my ride I could not breathe. I stopped my bike, went to the side of the trail, and spent a good five minutes trying to catch my breath. I caught it enough to continue to work, but when I sat down at my desk I just stared at my computer without doing anything. A coworker came up and said “Hey Stephanie, how’s it going?” And I just said, “A friend of mine just died.” And he said, “… are you okay? What are you doing here? You should really go home.”

I felt so sad. And so confused. I knew I couldn’t physically get enough air in my lungs to bike all the way back home, so I spent the next few hours sitting in the arboretum nearby, sunglasses on, staring off into space and just feeling terrible in a way I can’t describe in words. The next few days felt similar and are now largely a blur in my mind, but I distinctly remember feeling hideously guilty for not being able to focus on my research. I remember thinking, how does anyone get work done in a world where grief like this exists? I have known so many people who have experienced loss, and they’ve been able to resume working. Am I really so weak that I’m not going to be able to move on from something everyone experiences?

After about a week of feeling completely lost, I met with my advisor who told me I should make use of the free counselling services available on campus. He told me the counsellors there were actually specialised in dealing with grief. Apparently grief is a particularly common mental health issue for the university-aged population. So I went to one counselling session, where I talked about both of these losses I’d recently experienced and what specific aspects of these losses were continuing to rattle around in my head and make it difficult to think about anything else. I won’t go into detail of that session here, but I had a realisation that day that there was so much I was holding inside and not talking to someone about because I didn’t want to burden others with my own personal grief, which I thought I should be “strong” enough to move on from on my own. Turns out, having someone who is paid to listen to you unload your grief is a brilliant solution to this problem. I am now a huge advocate for therapy and highly recommend it particularly for people who are trying to move on from a loss, as I was. 

My main point in telling these stories is to say this: Life doesn’t stop when you’re in grad school. I know, this is painfully obvious to some. But I think I had expected grad school to be difficult in a very one-dimensional way, that the difficulty would come primarily from academic challenges I had never faced before. Yes, there were many difficult academic challenges I had never faced before. But the hardest part of grad school to me was managing to put my heart and soul into research while managing all other aspects of life. You only have so much heart and soul to give, and particularly when you’re going through a loss that feels like it is in fact ripping out the heart and soul you thought was reserved for your research for the next 2/5/10/20 years and has simultaneously taken over and completely destabilised your world… What do you do?

All I can say about loss is that it’s hard. The truth is, you’re probably not going to be prepared and you’re just going to have to feel bad for a while. Accept it. Once a loss happens, you’re not going to be able to swiftly get back the feeling you had prior. Accept it. Your research is going to need to be put on hold to give your brain time to recover and your energy bar to refill. Accept it. There are no shortcuts, there is no rule book, no grief manual with step-by-step instructions about what you need to do, so do what you feel when you feel it and don’t feel guilty for any reason for the time being. You’ll know when the time is right to get back to work. Relax.

Loss is an aspect of life that we cannot escape. It is more or less guaranteed to happen in your lifetime and it is likely to occur at a time when you’re trying to make it as an academic, whether you’re a PhD student, postdoc, new PI, whatever. You cannot prepare emotionally for future loss, so don’t try. It’s a waste of energy. Save your sadness for that day. Grief looks different from person to person and from loss to loss, and boy do I wish there was a way to predict what it will look like. There isn’t. But being a successful academic in the wake of loss doesn’t mean ignoring the loss and cranking out research papers despite it. You are a human. And I would argue that research papers actually benefit from being written by a human who has experienced a wide range of human emotions. These experiences are unlocking new and vitally important aspects of yourself, as well as your personal, and yes, your professional journey. They should be treated as such; they should not be dismissed or hidden. 

If loss is something you’re dealing with right now, you would be surprised how many people in your professional and social circles have gone through similar traumas. When you feel ready to, don’t be afraid to reach out to them.

I hope the information I have given here is useful in any way. Feel free to contact me, Stephanie Hare, at share[at]uw.edu if you have any questions or comments.

The subtle art of being mentored

Jim Pfaendtner

In academia we talk a lot about mentorship and its importance in professional formation. Sometimes the word can take on an overcharged meaning and outsized impact leading to a huge amount of unnecessary intimidation, anxiety and avoidance. Resources on being an effective and inclusive mentor abound online and I believe most anyone in higher education with a sincere interest in being an excellent mentor will have access to resources to develop that capacity.

But about about the flip side? We almost never talk about being mentored. I have been thinking obsessively about this subject for years, especially since reading Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In [c.f., Chapter 6: Are you my mentor?]. Much of what I’ll share below is intuitive and empirical. I am not a sociologist or psychologist and what has worked for me might not work for you. However, once you (the mentee) think about it I believe you will clearly understand “menteeship” is a trainable skill and a capacity you can (and should) work to build. You have a critical role to play in being mentored and the success will depend on you as much as the mentor.

If you join my research group, you will quickly learn that I love metaphors and stories as devices to use in my mentorship. It is a deeply engrained part of my style — not to be confused with the specific technique, which in this case is often getting you to see yourself in a new perspective and be open to a different way of thinking about a topic (e.g., imposter syndrome). In that vein, I offer the act of “menteeship” the process of extracting useful work from your mentor. Your mentor has knowledge, empathy and wisdom and you want it. They are obviously interested in providing it (or they wouldn’t be spending time with you), so how can you help?

The truth is, we’re already more than 50% of the way there. Just by taking a moment and tuning you into the fact that “mentorship” is an active process for both mentor and mentee your mind is already thinking about ways to increase your participation in the relationship, wondering how you can help, make the experience more effective, etc. Here are a few other tips that might help you go a bit further and guide your thinking.

  1. Understand what you want from your mentoring relationship. Even if it as primitive as “I want help with X” that is useful for you to know. You don’t necessarily need to share this with your mentor, but it will provide purpose and clarity to the questions you ask, the way you listen, and the feedback you seek. You will have many mentors with many different forms of mentoring (formal, informal, spontaneous, etc.) but if you can’t articulate at least a primitive idea about what you are hoping to get from a mentor — then maybe you are just friends :) I’ve often sought specific advice about managing my workload, conflict management, career planning and I often turn to different mentors for different topics. Professor X knows she is my career guru, but we have never really done a deep dive into diversity, etc…

  2. Ask for specific suggestions, follow them, and follow-up. Early on in my experience as a CrossFit athlete, I noticed that the owner of my gym took a personal interest in my success and made a point to reach out and ask me if I wanted to talk about my goals in fitness/health/nutrition. In the course of our conversations she provided me with several suggestions and followed up with a detailed training plan after I identified my specific goal (it was to do a handstand pushup). I followed the plan, reported back to her on how it was going, and a wonderful coach/athlete relationship was formed that lasted for years. I clearly recall asking her, “why me?” After all it is great to receive attention, but surely there were more skilled athletes who should have received that time (imposter syndrome is even there in the gym!) She laughed and said something like, “It’s easy. You asked for help, you did what I said and you told me how it went - almost nobody does that”. The point is not that you have to mindlessly follow every piece of advice that is given to you. But what happens if you never follow any of the advice, if you don’t internalize some suggestions, and if you never tell your mentor if/what impact the advice is having?

  3. Ask for what you think you need, not what you think your mentor can provide. I cannot count the number of conversations I’ve had with well-intentioned mentees who share something like, “I’d love to (meet more often / have you read X / ask you about Y / …) but I was worried that ( you’re too busy / I should figure it out on my own / …)” You can get the idea. I want to emphasize that as a mentee it is your job to ask for what you think you need. Your mentor usually can’t read your mind or your heart and is not going to figure it out for you (although some become pretty good at it over time). My universal response to all such protests is that it is my job to figure out what to provide to you. If you ask to meet with me 2 hrs/week, I usually can’t accommodate that, but it is going to start an important conversation about what you need in your life that requires that much time. We wouldn’t have had that conversation if you hadn’t asked. You’re a smart person and you get the idea. Don’t hamstring yourself by holding back.

  4. If you are grateful for mentorship, share your gratitude. If you have been a mentor in the past, why have you done it? If you haven’t yet, why would you want to do it? What are the intangible benefits you think might befall being a mentor? Now ask yourself what role does the mentee have assisting the mentor reaching their goals. As a mentee, I have often had a profound sense of gratitude for the time people invest in me, the thought they put in to helping me and the care they have given to me. It makes me incredibly happy to share that with with mentors, because I know that such feedback is both meaningful and rare. Life is busy and complicated and gratitude is one of the first things we put on the shelf. I would argue that one of the best ways you can recharge your mentor’s batteries (and keep them interested and able to help you) is to share some of the positive impacts they’ve made in your life and to be gracious and thankful for their investment of time in you. I understand why you might forget to do this, or why it might feel awkward or unnatural - but trust me and give it a try.

Good luck. You are eminently capable of being an excellent mentee. Go get it.

My Path to Getting a Faculty Position

Janani Sampath

There are a lot of great resources online about navigating the academic job market, and right off the bat, I want to list some that I found useful (this list is not exhaustive, a simple search online will generate a lot of results):

  1. Preparing Future Chemical Engineering Faculty

  2. Roman Voronov

  3. The Professor is In

Before I started applying, and all through the application process, I read up as much as I could about the academic job market, specifically about tenure track (TT) positions in R1/R2 institutes. It was important for me to get a broad perspective, that included people who were successful the first time they applied, people who went on the market multiple times, as well those who tried and called it quits! This is an account of how I approached the process - I’ve focussed on the big picture without going into specific details.

Timeline:

In my final year of grad school, I set a timeline for myself, keeping personal/visa related constraints in mind. These were my limitations:

  1. F1- OPT is valid for three years after graduation, which means I needed at least a year to look elsewhere if my faculty job search failed. I didn’t want to move to an academic H1 either. This is because if you are on an academic H1 visa at a university or national lab and wish to transition to an industry position, you are going from a visa that is not capped to one which is capped (and therefore has a lottery process that begins in April every year). While this can be done, it’s risky because you essentially only have 1 shot, and you need to give up your OPT extension time - I thought it best that I don’t take this chance.

  2. To be in the same city as my husband as soon as possible - at this point, we were almost a year into a long distance marriage (he was in Portland, OR and I was in Columbus, OH).

Considering the points above, I decided to apply for faculty positions a year into my postdoc (2019-2020 cycle). I also told myself that I’ll give it my best shot, but only do it once - if unsuccessful, I’d start applying for industry positions early in 2020, so that I could transition to a new position and still have 1.5 years on my STEM OPT. 

I graduated in May 2018, and started my postdoc in July. While looking for postdoc positions in the final year of my PhD, I made it clear to prospective PIs that I would be looking for an academic job. What struck me the most about Jim was his offer to mentor me on all aspects of the job application process - this was important because I heard from a lot of people that mentorship is crucial, in addition to getting a solid scientific record with papers, presentations, etc. Additionally, I was also looking for someone who had a lot of collaborators, so that I could work closely with research groups outside my own. I was also open about being in a long distance marriage, and asked if I could occasionally work from home every Mon/Fri, when I travelled between Seattle and Portland. In a nutshell, selecting a postdoc group is a vital step in the road to securing a TT position, and I chose PRG because I felt that I could pick up skills to complement what I had learned in my PhD, while not sacrificing my happiness too much! I was also fortunate to work in a great group of collaborative, supportive people, and had a lot of opportunities to hone my managerial skills along the way as well. Below, I’ve listed what I did at PRG from Jul 2018 to when I accepted an offer at the University of Florida (March 2020), explaining parts of the process along the way.

July 2018 - Oct 2018: Met with Jim and senior graduate students to understand open projects in the group, started thinking about my first few papers, started mentoring graduate students, had meetings with collaborators. Jim and I went over my CV, and tried to assess gaps that needed to be filled in a year's time so that I would have a competitive application package. 

Oct 2018 - Jan 2019: I spent this time focusing on science, co-wrote a short review chapter for a book (this helped me learn about the methods I would later implement). Decided to attend APS in Mar 2019, submitted an abstract for a talk (I regularly attended APS as a graduate student and didn’t want to miss a networking opportunity even though I knew I’d be the only PRG member there). Jim had an invitation to submit a paper in May 2019, and this gave me a realistic deadline to work toward. I filled out my first 6 month IDP with Jim, and we both decided that I needed 2 first author papers, in addition to the co-author projects that I was working on (at this point, I was working on 2-3 collaborative projects). We also started thinking about who will write my letters of recommendation, in addition to Lisa (my PhD advisor) and Jim. During this time, we attended the kickoff meeting for the EFRC center that I would be a part of, and thought that it would be helpful to get a letter from the directors of the center (provided I was a productive member of the center). So I made a mental note to be more vocal during meetings, and actively present my work during center meetings.

Jan 2019 - April 2019: On the job front, I read up extensively about applying for TT jobs, and looked closely into the profiles of people who were hired in R1 institutes in the last 2-3 years. Something that stood out to me was that most PIs were affiliated with a top 10 institute, or came from a lab of a well known (= National Academy member) PI. I spent a considerable amount of time fretting over this, and Jim and I had many conversations about this as well - ultimately, I realized that this was out of my control, and chose to focus on things that I could control (full disclosure, this was constantly in the back of my mind)! I also started to think about my future research, as the AIChE deadline was fast approaching (more about AIChE later). I attended APS, and that was fun. I realized that machine learning was a big focus in many of the sessions I attended in my division of polymer and soft matter physics. I started to wrap up the simulations for my first paper, and made a writing timeline. I also taught 3 stat mech/MD simulations classes. 

April 2019 - Jul 2019: I submitted 3 abstracts for AIChE - 1 poster (meet the faculty candidate session) and 2 talks. In retrospect, the extra talk was a lot of unnecessary effort. I would advise focussing on 1 talk and of course, the poster. The poster abstract was very different from any other abstract I’ve submitted, “As far as this abstract, we assume the main goal for you is to get a job. We recommend that you do not format it like a regular AIChE submission, but instead make it an advertisement of yourself as a faculty candidate.” Jim’s feedback on this abstract was invaluable, because I had no idea how to ‘sell’ myself. We submitted my first first-author paper from the group (at this point, I also had 3 co-author papers). I attended a brown bag lunch hosted by Elizabeth Nance (who happened to become an awesome mentor), who talked about the timeline for faculty applications in ChemE, and gave me some insight about the other side, i.e. the review process. I also attended a future faculty workshop - this was really helpful as well, and everyone should attend at least one such workshop in the year that they are applying, imo.

Aug 2019 - Nov 2019: Stressful times. AIChE was on Nov 10. Working my way back, I realized that I had to get in my applications at least 3 weeks before AIChE (~Oct 15), to ensure that the review committee looked at my application and (hopefully) met with me during the poster session. An application packet to R1/R2 institutions for TT positions consists of research, teaching, and diversity statements, a cover letter, CV, and 3-4 references. I wanted to make sure that my research statement was reviewed by multiple faculty members (I sent it to 5). So I had to be ready with a nearly perfect draft by Oct 1. I also had to focus on writing up and submitting my second first author paper from my postdoc, so that I didn’t have it listed under ‘MS in preparation’. I also met with Elizabeth Nance and Stephanie Valleau multiple times for tips and tricks. I quickly realized that 1 mentor isn’t enough (even though Jim was absolutely awesome)! In the end, I applied to 30 schools before AIChE.

Nov 2019 - Mar 2020: I networked as much as I could at AIChE - this was really tiring. But, I had people with me at all receptions, and I’m really grateful for that. Networking alone would’ve been an absolute nightmare. Selective networking is key (you can’t talk to everyone from every school you apply to). I made sure I carried business cards with details about my presentations to hand over to faculty that I spoke to. I applied to 5 more schools in this period (35 schools in total). After AIChE, the wait was tough. I would CONSTANTLY check my email. I made a spreadsheet of all the places I applied to, keeping track of schools that had requested for recommendation letters. I didn’t want to start working on my job talk and chalk talk unless I had an invitation. Once I got 1 onsite offer, I went full steam ahead. I had multiple practice sessions for my chalk talk, both with faculty in the department and PRG members (shout out to Lilo Pozzo and Elizabeth Nance who had to witness my first practice chalk talk which was a DISASTER). In the end, I had 5 on-site interview offers. The closest school was in Texas, everything else was on the east coast, and traveling was tiring. I made it a point to mention that my husband was also looking for an opportunity at all places that I interviewed at (this was something absolutely crucial). Ultimately, University of Florida turned out to be a great fit, and I accepted their offer (they also offered my husband a teaching faculty position). Unfortunately, we couldn’t go on a second visit, but that’s a small price to pay considering everything that was happening in the world at that point.

Retrospection: 

I feel very fortunate to have had 3 offers in the year that I did. I believe if I interviewed later, even by a week or two, I could very well have had none, because of the hiring freezes that were happening due to the pandemic. It goes without saying, but I couldn’t have done this without Jim’s mentorship. He always made time for meetings, even if it meant meeting over lunch, or when he was en route from one meeting to another. I’m glad I never hesitated to ask him for help! I am also glad that I reached out to other faculty members in the department who were hired recently, because this is a dynamic process where things are constantly evolving. No two paths are the same, from putting your application packet together, to negotiating an offer.

Planning ahead of time helped a lot, and having contingency plans in case plan A didn’t work out really helped keep my anxiety in check, because I knew that I didn’t put all my eggs in 1 basket. Everyone is different of course. 

Apart from the months leading up to AIChE, and the months that I was interviewing (~5 months in total), I would say that I had a pretty stress free postdoc. I took time off to travel, hike, and generally enjoyed my time in the PNW. I tried my best to not work on weekends. In my almost 2 years in the group (before quarantine), I always looked forward to coming in to work everyday because of my awesome group mates. All this was important, because I find myself needing a lot of energy as I’m starting my new job (wrapping up my postdoc, grant writing, planning my first course, recruiting my first students). 

I think it was helpful that I participated in activities not directly related to research.  I was selected as the Early Career Network (ECN) rep of our DOE center, was part of the ChemE chair’s advisory board, and was an active part of the UW postdoc network. At the end of 2019, I was selected to be a part of the Science Teaching Experience for Postdocs (STEP) cohort, where I learned about active learning methods, and co-taught a seminar class in Summer 2020 (my first experience teaching online). These were all valuable lessons that I will take into my new position - they taught me the importance of time management, and effectively utilizing a calendar (something I didn’t do as a grad student). 

I might have done two things differently (1) tried to get papers out faster (5 papers from my postdoc were published early in 2020, after I applied). But on the flip side, I feel like there’s never a limit to how many papers one can publish. (2) Helped Jim write a grant or two - this is definitely an area that I am struggling with now.

Closing Remarks for PRGs who want to go down this route: 

You can do this! Plan ahead, and stick to your timeline. This is a long process and doing anything in the last minute will make things harder than they need to be. 

Postdocs - don’t hesitate to ask Jim for help. Make sure you meet with him about your Individual Development Plan (IDP) periodically, and ask him what you can do to strengthen his recommendation letter for you.

Having 1 mentor is not enough (even if that mentor is Jim). Seek help, don’t be afraid to ‘hoard’ mentors. You will need this network of mentors even after you get a faculty position -- this is just the beginning!

Find a peer network, and support each other. I joined the ‘Future PI Slack’, and it’s been so rewarding going through this with others.

Good Luck!!! 

Life after PRG

Wesley Beckner

After defending my thesis in 2019, I set out to join a different kind of lab—a startup. A fresh data scientist venturing outside the graduate school sandbox, I began my journey of learning valuable work experience lessons. First, I learned to work with lots of different kinds of people and leverage divergent skill sets. In graduate school you'll frequently work alongside collaborators, but as first author, you will always have a major contribution to every facet of the publication and research. This is not true when you work on later projects in your career. The other members of your team are there to allow you to focus on what you do best (and you're there to allow them to do what they do best). So, a different quality of trust and delegation must emerge to achieve the highest synergy, where 2 + 2 > 4. Meshing the personalities, however, can be tough. Something I hadn't noticed was how homogenous a graduate student population can be. You and your lab mates are in the same field, you have similar background training, you're motivated by similar things, and you're cohabitating a region with certain norms and culture. When you leave the sandbox, you're going to encounter people with vastly different opinions than your own. Things that felt PC in the graduate bubble, will no longer be PC in this new circle. I had to learn how to get along with people, despite their opinions.

The second learning point came about in the area of self-care. In school, it's easy to adopt a habit of putting off self-care. You'll approach things like exams and due dates with a feast or famine perspective: "I'll get out and do the thing I enjoy when I don't have this on my plate." You'll do that with long periods of drought where you're really knuckling down. In school, this sort of behavior can have a plus side. Because you are on a rhythm with others in your cohort, it can foster a sort of community, a shared cycle of highs and lows with your comrades. In your career, this will likely have the opposite effect. No one is on the Crazy Train with you, and you'll find yourself distracted by your work even when you're supposed to be having time away from it. After realizing this, I changed my day-by-day approach to productivity and self-care. I made sure that 99% of my days were good ones, where I wasn't living for the future. That took a lot of time and habit forming and is still something I'm working on (maybe that's a lifelong project!)

Overall advice to life after graduate school, is to constantly evaluate yourself and your situation. You have the scientific mindset—apply it to your life! As described by Eckhart Tolle, you can either change your situation, leave the situation, or accept it. All else is madness.

Why we have a blog & how to find a research group

jim pfaendtner

The PRG blog is here to share our experiences and stories. Everyone in my group is invited to contribute posts and the hope is that we will have 3-4 posts per year.

It is time for graduate students to select research groups, and I decided to write the 1st post on my advice for finding a group. Choosing a research group is hard.

If you are a PhD student, this is the last time you will effectively get to pick your own boss, choose wisely. Every PhD student needs to consider their own personal mix of “advisor” vs “research area” vs “group culture”. When I was graduate program director, and a student would come to me with issues, the first three questions I would ask are “what is your relationship like with your advisor?” , “tell me about how your research is going?” and “how do you get along with your group?” Why? Because in grad school, all three are rarely functioning at a high level, but if you don’t have at least one leg to lean on, you are in trouble. All three matter, but their weights are different for each of you. Figure it out before you make your final decision and make sure you have a fighting chance of having your needs met when grad school gets tough (it will).

The choice for MS students is a little different. You are likely investing a lot of your resource to pursue a graduate degree. Good for you, and I hope it makes a positive impact in your career. You should look very hard at your potential advisor’s ability to help you reach your near term goals. Do you want to move on to a PhD program? Get an internship or job? Share your goals with your advisor and ask them how they have helped previous students and try and learn about how they will help you. You deserve it! We post all of our graduate alumni outcomes on our members page so that you can have a good understanding of where people go when they leave our group.

Undergraduate research is a hugely different experience for each person. I mostly washed glassware and did sample prep for 3 years, and that was good enough to get me into grad school (thankfully). In contrast, I’ve had undergraduates publish 1st author research manuscripts. The hard reality is that there are usually more interested people than opportunities. This is even more true in the pandemic when there are capacity limitations in wet labs. You should carefully research different labs and be ready to explain why you want to join that particular lab. Prospective UG researchers in my lab need to attend two rounds of our subgroup meetings to learn about projects, meet people in the lab, and identify if the problems that we are excited about are also exciting to you. You should do reading outside of these meetings, ask for papers and materials to prepare, nothing makes us happier than when prospective group members are engaged and showing genuine interest.